Klippoth versus Loners

by Philip Marsh

There is a war that exists which is based on the fact that klippoth tends to COMPARE ITSELF to the loner at all times and the loner is usually unaware that this is going on. If aware, the loner doesn't tend to care one way or the other. The klippoth would definitely care about it. The klippoth cares what others do. Loners not only don't care, but normally don't even tend to notice what others do or are into unless it is something they LIKE.

1. Comparisons are made by klippoth of himself and the loner. Klippoth comes up "short" or "wanting" in this comparison HE has made.

2. Klippoth develops an attitude over this comparison (your hair is naturally straight, MINE is curly: I feel that YOURS is better. Or: you play the piano and klippoth does too, but klippoth studied as long as you and plays the way you played the first time you TRIED the instrument. You played it because you naturally gravitated toward it and had innate, inborn ability. Klippoth GOT INTO PIANO "in order to"             [fill in the blank -- it's all WANNABE]). The attitude seems to be from the klippoth toward the loner, but in fact the klippoth has an attitude against himself. This might be obvious to the loner: straight and curly hair, abilities with piano; but the loner is also passively aware that no two trees are the same size and the sky looks different every day and it rains one day and is sunny the next. This is taken for granted as "the way it is." There is no judgment, no CARE.

3. Klippoth develops self-hate (which is what wannabe is) especially when he seeks to change himself and "be like" the loner "in order to" equalize the comparison HE made and feels inferior about. He may think the loner "must FEEL superior," that's ego-projection. The loner has no such concept, he just DOES HIS OWN THING. Klippoth ego-projects "Why of course the loner must feel superior because I feel INFERIOR and if I could do what he can do, I'd BE superior." Meanwhile, the loner has dropped it, forgotten it, IF he even noticed it.

4. Klippoth realizes he can NOT equalize the comparison HE made, he can only change in artificial or superficial ways which do not suit him, or STRIVE and STRIVE to try to BE LIKE the loner (doesn't he have an inner self TO BE? NO, he does not!). Klippoth may feel guilt over this and even more self-hate. Of course the loner with the straight hair may wish to curl it in an artificial way, but the loner simply does this for himself without caring WHO ELSE notices it or cares about it. The loner may wish to paint his room another color: he simply does it. He wants to do it -- so he does it. He does not do it to "be like" someone else. The loner feels: I LIKE, I WANT, I DO.

5. At this point in the klippoth's self-hate, the klippoth may decide to forget he ever met the loner and simply retreat from the situation and return to other klippoth that plays the same games he plays. This is WISE for klippoth to do. He'd be returning to his own kind.

Or, he may delude himself into thinking he has "really changed." In this delusion of "really changed," he may seek the loner's approval of HIS superficial or artificial changes through discussion: he has to SHOW the loner "the new himself." This is involving the loner in HIS business (the project of self-improvement), whereas the loner never involves anyone in his business, e.g.: he is sick, so he goes to a doctor to FIX it. His malady is from outside (a virus or bacteria), whereas the klippoth's malady is from INSIDE HIMSELF, he wants to fix him-SELF, not be rid of a malady that befell him from outside. The loner simply DOES; he CHANGES as all things change.

The self-hate of the klippoth can provoke any of these behaviors or combinations of these behaviors, or behaviors where the klippoth seeks to lower the loner to equalize and "eliminate" the cause of his own self-hate. He will then be perceiving the loner's EXISTENCE as the cause of his own self-hate. He may combine many behaviors in all of this delirium, even demanding help from the loner for his own "project": "WORKING ON HIMSELF."

6. Various adjustments are made as stated above of the klippoth's relationships to the loner and a "modus operandi" is reached. Then the CYCLE of behaviors in various new forms repeats itself over and over taking on outwardly new forms, more complex forms involving more "discussions," different angles of the same "discussion." The klippoth wants the loner to give up his existence and be as occupied with the "NON-LIFE OF THE KLIPPOTH" as the klippoth person is. When the klippoth gets the loner to pay attention, he feels that "he exists," now he also has a life, he feels. All the discussions say the same thing, go over the same PROJECT.

New comparisons may arise in the klippoth when he "finds out" that the loner can DO something he never KNEW he could do. All kinds of attitudes arise: the loner deliberately kept it secret from him, he feels. No: it just never came up. Old comparisons may arise again when the klippoth's self-made delusion of equality is shattered by reality crashing in, or when klippoth realizes that the loner never approved OR disapproved of ANYTHING he was doing (including his self-help project) and klippoth realizes that all these wasted actions and words meant NOTHING to the loner. The loner was "TO HIMSELF" all the while the klippoth was going thru this DELIRIUM of wasted emotion/thought. Klippoth sees he has been playing games with HIMSELF and not with the loner and this realization brings out the old comparisons again in repeat cycles.

He doesn't GET IT. And he can not get it, he is UNABLE TO GET IT. What does this loner HAVE that he does not have? A SELF: an ORGANIC "I." He might notice that the loner often turns within, and when this happens the klippoth feels keenly, "I don't exist." He FEELS this.

Throughout all of this, the klippoth could still simply go away, far away, and STAY away returning to his own kind of people. He could retreat either with the feeling that he and the loner will never see eye to eye on ANYTHING and NEVER BE the same (be as in BEING). He could even retreat with the sour-grapes ego-lie: "Well, that loner has surely lost a valuable friend in me!" Klippoth lives in the world of "value and worth," and they DO NOT MEAN "worth" in the inner sense. Worth in the inner sense is more like "BEING." (The worm has WORTH, the ocean has WORTH). Klippoth can leave and keep this delusion that "the loner lost a valuable friend" since this lie will never be shattered by reality: "the loner doesn't CARE what the klippoth does." No care? Then no value ascribed to the object. Loner DOES care if his HOME burns down. CARE.

7. When klippoth persists to the point where the comparison is made that the loner has a SELF and klippoth does not, then this has gotten very deep inside, it concerns the self-perceived ROOT of his self-hate -- the lack OF a self and all the "evil" within himself which really seeks to make everyone as EMPTY as he is. This might all involve morals. Then klippoth invades the loner's territory (inner space) and declares WAR on him. This invasion can take a concrete form such as a physical fight or passive-aggressive vengeance, screaming arguments, pestering phone calls; or it may take on a non-concrete form: CLINGING -- a psycho-physical (or biochemical like pheromone?) attack. This form of attack exhausts a person, wears him down by destroying or limiting his ability to follow HIS OWN normal pathways; it stops a person from FLOWING inwardly. The klippoth was doing this all along in his "comparing" mode -- a kind of "LOOKING" or nosing-INTO what another person has inside. The klippoth is throwing himself away "in order to" try to BE something he is not and can not be: ANOTHER PERSON.

Loners never declare war on the klippoth. Loners wish only to be left alone to their own pathways, their own affinities, their OWN THINGS. Loners will be happily willing to SHARE in the true sense of this word, but loners do NOT wish to share with thieves trying to steal their lives. When klippoth associates with a loner, WAR is inevitable, it is only a matter of time. Even if klippoth retreats after a "painful comparison" arises, if he returns again another "painful comparison" will be made. The loner rarely notices ANY of this nonsense and just goes on until his territory is invaded: until the klippoth person INFLICTS himself to such an extent on the loner that it can not help but BE noticed. The loner may then humor the klippoth and outright LIE to him, wear a mask in order to reinforce the klippoth's delusion, to prevent clinging; however the loner, in HAVING TO RESORT to these tactics, is already deviating from his normal path.

The loner may experience revulsion at the vileness of the klippoth if this goes on and he is FORCED to NOTICE the klippoth. He may feel that the klippoth is like a piece of furniture that is always in the way. All the while the klippoth is perceiving all sorts of affronts and attacks, compliments and/or insults (dualistic) as if he NEEDS this loner to NOTICE HIM to feel that he exists.

What klippoth never understands is that the loner is never comparing himself with anything. He is never trying to BE anything he is not. He is never trying to be another loner or another person's equal. He doesn't CARE. The loner IS like the things of nature: if he is rock-like he sits quietly and is difficult to move; if he is air-like he blows here and there at his whim, coming and going and changing direction; if he is water-like he seeks his own level and wears down obstacles; if he is fire-like he rises and consumes what he touches; and if he is void-like he is yin-ful inside and echoes or reflects, like a mirror, everything he senses.

The loner IS WHAT he IS: this is truth and Cosmic Law. There are as many types of loner as there are loners. NO TWO are alike! Each is a Class of One, all different, accepting that and FLOWING ON. This IS "the big secret" of the loner which klippoth never can and never has fathomed. It is beautifully simple. His morality consists of one thing: "It is GOOD TO BE ME, it is NOT GOOD TO BE ANYTHING THAT I AM NOT." This is the "secret" of the loner's so-called "superiority" as defined by Nietzsche.

Is it superior? No. It is JUST DIFFERENT. It certainly is NOT conducive to mammalian living wherein mammals either band together equally to do something (the fasces concept), or band together under one leader that they obey (fascism). The klippoth can NOT fathom this, and one might conclude that anyone who THINKS this is "superior" is klippoth himself for making that comparison in the face of MAMMALIAN LIFE! The KLIPPOTH ONLY, SOLELY and EXCLUSIVELY SEES the loner in terms of HIS OWN subjective ego-comparisons of INFERIOR VERSUS SUPERIOR! The loner sees NOTHING this way unless it is strictly and purely practical (Sony Trinitron TV is a SUPERIOR TV).

Loners all say, "I AM WHAT I AM, WHO I AM, NOTHING MORE." If Jehova said, "I AM THAT I AM" then Jehova was a loner! The people who chose to honor Jehova did NOT try to BE LIKE Jehova; they lived their lives and they set up their own very human family values. Jehova was Jehova, out there: ALIEN in essence.

It was OTHER people that gave Jehova a son and worshiped that son and then TRIED TO BE LIKE what they ego-projected he'd be like.

They have monumentally said NO to life and to the world. They have also monumentally said NO to "the individual" and have HATED the loners (including GROUP-loners who happened to worship Jehova but not his son....) Their tendency to CONFORM, or "be like clones" is so ubiquitous that one might call it INNATE to their type or breed. They ARE pre-eminent JOINERS/FOLLOWERS -- it doesn't matter what they join or who they are following.

They are NOT "their own law unto themselves" AT ALL. When they TRY to be this, they become sociopathic lunatics, or are overbearingly arrogant, dry, sterile and intellectually BARREN. They scream about how individual they are, but they have a BOOK someone wrote for them and something that they JOINED that gives them a feeling of "being better than all who did not join the club." They are NOT loners that joined a club for practical and material fun or gain.

The klippoth thereby always nullifies his own Will: he would have to have a SELF in order to have a Will. There is no "I AM" in klippoth. He STRIVES for it.

The person who claims that loners are "Gods unto themselves" does so because JEHOVA (the God they believed in once) said "I AM THAT I AM." Loners are not gods. They are SIMPLY LONERS. They generally have NO concept of "a god" unless they refer to a force that is keenly felt which is in ALL nature around them and which seems to MOLD that nature in ways that are mathematically predictable. One would have to HAVE an organic-Self to be ABLE to feel this very real force, to begin with! So klippoth tends to BELIEVE in unseeable GODS who are POWERFUL and then identify with them due to their own real LACK OF ANY power: the lack of that "I AM" for real, a brain damage of a kind. Loners DON'T CARE about this kind of SHIT.

That "I AM" can NOT BE shared, not with ANYONE. It is exclusively individual, it is ONE OF A KIND only occurring once. Two can be similar, but never ALIKE. The closest thing to "GOD" the klippoth ever bumps into is a loner! Yet the loner is not a god, but merely a mortal being who is completely whole. The klippoth might be perceiving that dark-force and the FLOWING the loner innately does as "godlike." As such, the klippoth might perceive a "spark" in the loner. But many normal-herd people ALSO FLOW AND HAVE this spark, and they are quite normal for mammals. It is the klippoths that LACK this flow and spark, that LACK that "organic-I" that tend to try to CLING to loners and see them as gods. ONLY THEY DO THIS!

Normal herd mammals DON'T CARE if some stranger is a loner. They MIGHT care if their child is one IF the child neglects to do practical chores. That's normal! Telling a close person who is normal-herd that you DO NOT CARE what he or she does, usually translates as "you don't love me." That, again, is mammalian. The klippoth hears this as not only a declaration of war, but as something UNFATHOMABLE to him: he can NOT grasp it. The klippoth also can NOT grasp the concept, "Do what you want!" -- or "Do As Thou WILLT" -- because they HAVE NO Will.

Fact is, you WILL do "as thou Willt" whether you realize you are doing it or not. It is INNATE. The zygote WILL BECOME a foetus. The foetus WILL BECOME a baby. There is NO effort in this. It just HAPPENS. This IS what Nietzsche meant when he defined "self-overcoming" and said that this "Willen" is the same FORCE that is hidden and pushes the cosmos forward. There is no STRIVING about it. You can battle against this innate Will and make life into misery by STRIVING, or you can flow with it. A cat that battles the fact that it IS a cat has a miserable life. It strives to be a dog. It CAN NOT BE a dog. Cosmic Law forbids it. It IS WHAT IT IS: A CAT, UNIQUE, INDIVIDUAL, different from other cats.

THE NORMAL HERD:

The normal herd can be seen especially in nomadic and/or hunter-gatherer populations. Agricultural practices seem to be what not only CAUSES klippoth to come about, but does nothing to weed it out. Klippoth in the other types of populations wouldn't survive to grow and have descendants. A well-known example today of one hunter-gatherer population is the African Bushman. He never takes more than he needs and he shares ALL with every member. All have complete equality even if some duties (chores) are divided up by male, female, children -- in the end they all share. They talk about what normal herd talk about -- who is having a baby, who caught this food yesterday, the weather, etc. They are very peaceful and good-natured people and if one makes a mistake they all share in the laughter -- it never is taken as a "big deal" if a person errs. The children learn to use a bow and arrow expertly by the age of 6. This is what they want, these are their aspirations: to continue, to be like mom and/or dad. They do not "GET INTO THINGS" such as the NATURE OF the antelope they just ate.

Here are some examples of normal herd hanging around with loner. Everything is ho-hum statis quo and fine until the loner sees his "favorite thing" and goes for it. Let us say, it is the observation of a comet at an astronomical observatory. Then everything DROPS -- he goes there. Nothing else matters except "THE COMET." Few non-loners understand this and they pass it off as "a hobby" "the favorite interest." If it results in "you don't love me" or "you love that comet more than me," then that's the end of the affair. Either that, or clinging results. IN that case, the person doing this is not normal herd, he or she is a klippoth. They WANT something the loner CAN NOT give them.

The normal herd goes on a date with another easy-going person who is a loner. His "THING" is entymology. The date is planned for dinner, a movie and sex. All of a sudden insects get brought up. Forget the dinner the movie and even forget the sex. Loner might end up sitting in the car all night talking about insects to his "date." That's all that matters to the loner. Few dates would grasp this. If the date is also a loner, the date would KNOW what was going on and even be passively interested in the insects, perhaps.

Longtime friend all of a sudden develops cancer. Loner comes over: "Oh, yeah, so did you see the doctor for the cancer medicine? OH, GOOD then, you have the medicine. And last week Morden was captured by Sheridan and Babylon Five showed that strange world and....." In other words, because someone has cancer, life doesn't stop. It is literally NOT EVEN PART OF the loner's existence and if this friend gets so sick he can't talk anymore, the loner just might forget about him. This would be judged callous or cold. But no. Loners ARE LIKE that. They can't CARE about something they DO NOT care about! And the DO-NOT-CARE- ABOUT includes his friend's cancer problem! There are no FALSE feelings of sympathy, no FALSE efforts to say the "right words" of condolence. The loner can say those words, but if he doesn't FEEL anything one way or the other, then he DOES NOT FEEL ANYTHING. That is just the WAY IT IS. What CAN one feel? Sorry for himself because he is about to LOSE a friend to cancer!? Yes: that is exactly what grief is. Sound selfish? It's the truth. The loner is not deluded -- and they tend to be an in-general smarter population group. HE is about to LOSE something: his friend. And so? He accepts it. He does not dwell on it. He is STILL INTO the THINGS he was always into. NOTHING has changed! LIFE goes on!

Loners tend to have problems with non-loners (not a war as with a klippoth) because the normal herd mammal feels he or she is not "being paid attention to." How does such a statement translate to a loner. Well: are you reading this? Then you are paying attention. Are you talking to me and am I hearing you? Then I am paying attention. Is there more? Not to us loners. Being pawed or petted while trying to PAY ATTENTION TO a movie the loner is trying to watch, is NOT something loners like. Eventually the loner says "GET OFF me, GET OUT of my space!" Normal herd mammals seldom grasp this and are often HURT by it. But that's the WAY IT IS!

Many loner males have married REALLY stupid women who were INTO "being a wife, cooking, etc." just because of this. She has her cooking and house things and he has his other things. They do not BOTHER each other and they DO tend to get along fine: out of each other's hair!

Loner women do not find such men as easily: really stupid men are even MORE prone to being fawned over and fawning.

Gay queens make the best loners. Lesbians don't have it as easy. That (among gays) has been my observation.

Herd seem to impose on each other in small ways. Loners tend to not tolerate ANY impositions on themselves. EG: can't smoke in the herd's car? OK -- loner won't RIDE IN that person's car. NO COMPROMISE on the loner's free time. The car is not a doctor's office. Loner has his own car -- he can ride in it. NO PROBLEM for the loner.

But herd might never grasp this. Loners DO NOT sacrifice THINGS OF their lives unless they WANT TO. WANT TO: key words. Other key loner words: DO NOT WANT TO. If herd makes an issue of it, the loner tends to just leave, part ways. He doesn't WANT a conflict or even to discuss it. To the loner it's not a problem.

Today, most loner women who are straight just stay unmarried. If they want sex, they go out and get it and don't TRY to bond with a man. Also, women do not REQUIRE this kind of bonding to the opposite sex, by nature.

Klippoths ALWAYS try to form bonds. Among normal herd they have a problem because normal herd mammals already have VERY NORMAL bonds. The bonds are like gardens and the members of the herd group are the plants IN that garden. They have antennae that are quite good at detecting WEEDS/klippoths. Often, they tend to forget they even MET the klippoth.

Klippoths often find loners, as said. Klippoths are loners of a kind too, but never by choice. They are LONELY and EMPTY. They also "GET INTO THINGS" but ALL of it is sublimation. They also tend to JUDGE normal herd as inferior and fancy themselves superior.

Loners DO NOT do this, they are JUST loners; they have no problem with herd. If they see normal herd mammals (or any other animals) far out-breeding their own capabilities (as I did) they tend to WONDER about it and view human life as if bacteria in a petri dish. This is NOT condescending: but it sure SOUNDS LIKE IT IS to most people! It is just highly clinical.

Klippoths might get into "THINGS" but nothing they say (if you listen carefully) makes a wit of sense: there is NO logic to it. Ultimately it is all "wannabe." Loners, such as the entymologist, DO KNOW about insects: FOR REAL. They do not know about insects IN RELATION TO humans. The insects are the focus themselves FOR themselves. EROS for knowledge.

The klippoth is thanatos. It is not so easy to tell the difference between the two types save that klippoths are highly RIGID in their non-thinking illogic because it is really ALL sublimation. Loners can take any side or argue any side because they do not really CARE at all. EG: they are not on the side of the good guys on the Babylon 5 show or the bad guys. They just watch the show -- GET INTO it -- they yinfully LET the show tell itself to them. Loners are PASSIVE like this -- even in how they study insect life. WE OBSERVE -- DETACHEDLY. The "THING" observed has no BOND with the loner's self, and in reality it really does NOT have a bond. With sublimators, the "THING" is always something REPRESENTING something OTHER than what the thing really is. That is why they talk nonsense.

The klippoth looks down on the normal herd as if he is better than them. Finding a loner, the klippoth tries to bond as if they are "of like mind." NOTHING could be further from the truth and more dangerous TO any loner. Loners do NOT look down on normal herd mammals even if what they might SAY, based on observation, could sound like this. They don't FEEL better than anyone or anything. They are, in fact, smarter. Testably so. This I learned quite by accident.

Consider: the average all-human IQ is 90-100. An IQ of 70 is a retarded person. Most loners have IQ points above 150. Now, if only 20-30 points distinguishes between a moron and a normal intelligence person -- how much more different is the normal person from the loner with 50 or more IQ points difference? MUCH different.

A sampling of who watches which TV shows can even show this and it is how I learned of it. Loners tend to GET INTO sci-fi and/or science shows. Normal folks love their soap operas or light humor shows or sports. Loners might PLAY sports, but they seldom watch it. Most people are unable to grasp biological or mathematical concepts presented on science or sci-fi shows.

What I would assume is that anyone born to the African Bushmen with an IQ of 70 OR 170 didn't live very long! Such people would be unable to exist among them. One would be unable to function well, the other would not WANT to function with them and have nowhere else to go.

The fact is, most of the people found with IQ's so high they almost went off the scale were NOT in positions or jobs that had anything to do with GROUP effort wherein they'd HAVE TO deal with other humans. None of them were in the "smart" professions, nor were they professors in colleges where they'd HAVE TO deal with students (other people). They were LONERS. Some drove trucks. Some worked assembly lines and THOUGHT THOUGHTS all day. One was a prostitute! One woman, IQ over 200, decorated interiors of homes on her own. One doesn't even need a high-school education to do most of the things these super-high IQ loners were doing.

Loners do not tend to STRIVE -- they tend to FLOW and they love to PLAY. Klippoths love to play too, but it is ALL sublimated and/or vicariously sexual; their play is more of an ESCAPE FROM reality: a vacation from the "SELF" they don't have which renders them painfully empty. They DO strive and they CAN NOT flow. But in the playing itself, the klippoth often bumps into the loner "doing his OWN THING." He thinks he found a person of like mind. They may be of like mind in that one thing, but the loner is a whole flower blooming fully by itself. The klippoth is a WEED striving to share the flower's water. The loner is really INTO the thing-itself; the klippoth can be described as having non-sexual "sex"! That's the WAR. And if they share that "same thing" the loner, as said, tends to ignore the klippoth's oddity which is his CLINGING AND lack of ability to always make real sense.

Why are humans mostly normal herd? Because they are MAMMALS and mammals normally tend to need EACH OTHER in order to survive. One need only look at an infant human to KNOW this.

Does the loner feel alienated? No! He merely does his own thing on his own while he often does other things with the rest of his own herd group or family: such as feed and cloth that helpless infant human that happens to be his child. Does the klippoth feel alienated? Yes. But this has NOTHING TO DO with what the klippoth is into -- since he could just go and get INTO IT if he chose. He feels alienated (FROM NATURE AND HIS OWN NATURE) because he is PENT-UP, SPLIT. If anything, the loner is plugged DIRECTLY INTO nature and CAN EXIST ALONE in it almost as if he or she has somehow transcended the mammalian dependence nature.

The loner never does this on purpose or tries to do this. It is just the WAY the loner IS: it IS his or her NATURE. They are NEVER LONELY. It doesn't matter if, eg, the loner is INTO biology alone or with another he or she is able to communicate data with. It doesn't matter.

The reason why the klippoth can not get INTO something alone is because he is not REALLY INTO what it APPEARS he is into. It is ALL sublimation. As such, he CAN NOT BE alone -- he HAS to cling-feed off of another person.

He can't do this easily with normal herd because the normal herd is already BONDED IN FULL with NORMAL bonds -- like plants in a garden: THEIR OWN garden. The herd all have "their own gardens." Loners are a garden of one. Klippoths have no garden, no home, no PLACE IN NATURE or in THEIR OWN nature. They are SPLIT OFF from it. It is far easier for a klippoth to sneak into a garden of one than to try to crash through a garden of many.

Normal herd "klippothic psychic vampire antennae" DO NOT get activated when the loner comes around. The loner is passive, yinful; herd tends to LIKE him or her. When they find that they are not "joiners in" they don't tend to even mind this. They see "oh, he has a HOBBY."

If a possible lover tends to get TOO CLOSE to the loner, the person might get hurt: the loner will NEVER LOVE HIM (or her) as much as he loves the THING HE LOVES. NEVER. Loners innately walk the wheel of life ALONE. They travel WITH normal herd here and there, AND with other loners. Some of them bump into the klippoth on the trail and have to GET RID of the leech: that's the war. Herd walks the wheel TOGETHER all the time -- they are bonded in natural ways like the Bushmen.

This clan versus loner nature also is known to exist in the Orca -- another mammal. MOST reptiles are loner animals, if not all of them. Insects such as ants and bees are GROUP animals with definite bonds. So mammals tend to share something in their nature in common with these insects -- and loners tend to be more like reptiles. Klippoths are like nothing in nature -- and the alienation they FEEL (emptiness) is that they are NOT ROOTED IN THEIR OWN nature -- they are dualist, split in half. Their minds WAR WITH their bodies. There is NOTHING in nature like them and what they are is OBSTRUCTIVE -- they even obstruct themselves and/or provoke their own doom. They set themselves up TO FAIL immediately or in the future. That's what THANATOS is. The WILL TO perish. They never just PERISH (kill themselves) because the Will they have is all unconscious due to the split.

CF: "Akathartic and Ophionic States of Being" and "Do All People Have Worth?" by Tani Jantsang.

Visit: Satanic Reds